Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[DOWNLOAD] "J. Gerard Hogan v. Mark E. Musolf" by United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

J. Gerard Hogan v. Mark E. Musolf

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: J. Gerard Hogan v. Mark E. Musolf
  • Author : United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • Release Date : January 26, 1991
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 69 KB

Description

This case does not involve the question of whether these retirees are entitled to a tax refund. Nor does it involve the question of the amount of such refund. It involves only the question of what route these retirees must take in pursuing their claim for refund. The primary issue presented is whether these retirees must exhaust their state administrative remedies before filing a sec. 1983 action in state courts. The defendants, the present and three former secretaries of the Department of Revenue (collectively the Department), seek review of a court of appeals decision which allowed these retirees to seek their sec. 1983 relief in the state courts. The plaintiffs (retirees) brought this action in state court under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 alleging that the Department had violated, and was continuing to violate, their federal statutory and constitutional rights by exacting taxes that discriminate against retired federal employees. Our decision requires that we address four issues: 1) Are violations of sec. 111 regarding intergovernmental immunity claims actionable under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983? We conclude they are. 2) Does federal law require state courts to entertain sec. 1983 actions in tax matters where the plaintiff has not exhausted established state administrative remedies? We conclude federal law does not so require if the state administrative remedies are plain, adequate, and complete. 3) Are Wisconsins administrative remedies plain, adequate, and complete? We conclude they are. 4) Does Wisconsin law require these retirees to exhaust available state administrative remedies before commencing a sec. 1983 action in the Wisconsin courts? We conclude it does. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals decision which affirmed the circuit courts order granting injunctive relief to the plaintiffs and denying the Departments motion to dismiss.


PDF Ebook Download "J. Gerard Hogan v. Mark E. Musolf" Online ePub Kindle